0b39604ffc4c158627562fa86c548b83.jpeg

Experts are calling for a shift from reactive to proactive clinical trial procurement frameworks


With supply chain disruptions becoming more severe and frequent in the past decade, moving from a reactive to proactive paradigm in clinical trials will help make strategic decisions easier, according to experts.

The prioritization of supply chains in clinical trial design was a key topic of discussion at the 2024 Outsourcing in Clinical Trials and Clinical Trials Procurement East Asia conferences, held in Seoul, South Korea, from December 3 to 4.

A report by GlobalData shows that supply chain breaches have become worse and more frequent in the last decade. Reworking supply chains is complex and expensive, with no quick fix. Cases where the chain cannot keep up with demand can create a shortage of medicine, which has recently been seen in the pharmaceutical industry with the popular drug Wegovy (semaglutide) for weight loss.

Fiona Barry, editor-in-chief and director of PharmaSource, GlobalData, explained in a session the main challenges of supply chains. Increased demand and shortages of active ingredients contributed the most to current drug shortages in the US, according to her analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) drug shortage database.

Panelists at the conference pointed out that supply chain logistics is often the “last cog” to be installed and often the forgotten area of ​​clinical research. Since supply chains are not involved in strategic decisions, this can create constraints through manufacturing protocols and strategy. Emphasizing supply chains earlier in the clinical research journey could create trials that are more robust to disruptions.

For example, Amaury Jeandrain, clinical supply strategy consultant at N-Side, said: “If the supply chain could influence protocol design, we could have protocols that are friendly to the supply chain .”

Jeandrain explained that reducing drug waste can have a strong impact on supply chain costs, mediated through supply chain-friendly protocols.

Hye Jung Yang, a panelist and clinical project manager at MedPacto, took the defensive view, explaining that risk mitigation should be done before the trial begins. She said it is much easier to use data to predict issues than to deal with them once they happen.

An area that may be more difficult to predict, however, is unexpected disruption. Geopolitical issues are a major source of disruption in the supply chain, according to analysis by GlobalData. These situations, along with problems such as quality issues or computer shortages, are almost impossible to predict. Hurricane Helene, for example, created a severe shortage of intravenous (IV) fluid bags on the US East Coast due to flooding of facilities in October – this delayed several clinical trials in the area. In addition, discussions are ongoing about the potential disruption to R&D and manufacturing as a result of the BIOSECURE Act – legislation aimed at preventing Chinese biotechs and manufacturers from accessing and collaborating with US pharma companies using federal funding.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *