As you must do facts using blocking block technology

As the scandal continues to develop and experts explore the US National Security Officers in this Show Chat Chat Leak– In shame to themselves through controversial statements – I want to look at one more detail on one special program from the story.

First, the white house out went out that the chat was ever. However, when it was clearly became too evidence, reject to tactics, refusing to have limited information in the importance of national security. And of course, which proof can the Haffrey Bingberg vote after the chabat left that? In addition, the cat was automated on automatic messages after time. So think a court hearing where there needs any evidence of evidence available in the other words, such as evidence is unable.

The announcement reply is a simple reporter – if the journalist has taken care to keep these evidence properly. It may prove that he has access to conscious information at a time when he did not have, declaring the Hash's sums. It hadn't been at the cat, he would not know when and where they expected to beat, whose target was, and so on. Microsoft details can be public forward, but not at the time of the chat?

The solution is in a cryptographic way called proof that it is without a revelation. It includes two basic elements: Cryptographacts and reliable timiles. This can be done on hand by notice – if one knows the process processing and through various candidates offering timescale disruption to a blocking timetable periodic declaration.

This is how it works: you write a message (for example, by coping and posting from Hash, you will be able to acknowledge the initially used to be published. 'Donate Action with Social Subject Places of social platforms reflects accessible systems and, unlike Blocars.

Therefore, it's like that for journalists who could test one day without appearing it.

This process creates a menu without confirming a original message and he knew the Blocking Blocking until the journalist was shown to do so.