In the world of decentralized networks, the battle lines are drawn not only between different blocks but within the communities they spawn. Bitcoin, after spending its own civil war, has emerged stronger, proving its stability and commitment to the principles of decentralization, freedom, and Truth. Ethereum, on the other hand, is currently involved in an internal struggle, showing a major difference in community philosophy and leadership philosophy.
Vitalik Buterin's recent tweets regarding the Ethereum Foundation drama are a testament to this. They reveal a community that seems to prioritize awareness over substance, which is a symptom of the bureaucratic and “woke” culture that has permeated society at large. Ethereum's approach, under Buterin's leadership, reflects a refusal to embrace the “bronze age mentality” that has been at the heart of Bitcoin's success. This mentality, often derided as “toxic maximalism” by outsiders (the word “maximal” was coined by Vitalik himself, by the way), supports facts unapologetic and strongly defend core values such as decentralization and security.
Toxicity, in this context, becomes virtue. It is favorable to those who are willing to speak uncomfortable truths and to maintain the integrity of the original vision of the blockchain. By choosing the path of bureaucratic, HR-friendly discussions, you will end up in a landscape where the management of ideas trumps the achievement of actual results. Ethereum's current situation is not only a long shot but perhaps a necessary wake-up call for those who have strayed from the path to what blockchain technology was meant to achieve.
In contrast, Ethereum's current turmoil is showing a leadership that is cracking under pressure, showing Buterin's true colors – not for the first time.
Bitcoin, unlike Ethereum, has no Foundation, and this is by design. Does this make our regulatory process a hundred times more difficult? Of course, and that's exactly the point. Even though I may not always agree with the criticism leveled at Bitcoin Core, I recognize the value of knowing that they can be replaced at any given moment. The Ethereum Foundation has always been a tool for centralized control, and the power vacuum let it fall it will cause chaos. Bitcoin's reign could be organized chaos, but Ethereum is now facing a spell of unorganized chaos that could further tarnish its reputation. I would love to see Vitalik return to Bitcoin; it is undoubtedly intelligent. However, his current role as the “man in control” is exactly why Bitcoin avoids the public spotlight. The plebs, the node runners are in control – and that's the best way.
The “.ETH” community's seeming lack of commitment to these basic blockchain principles portends a future where Ethereum not only suffers greatly from its civil war but may also lose its relevance.
The irony here is palpable; while Ethereum struggles, other platforms such as Solana benefit.
But it seems that those who make this migration do not learn from their mistakes. They recognize the ugly side of Ethereum and Vitalik, but instead of seeking the true axioms of a good network, they move to a more centralized alternative.
However, this trend seems to be temporary. The so-called “On-Chain refugees” fleeing the chaos of Ethereum will eventually find their way back to Bitcoin, the original and only cryptocurrency that has consistently fulfilled its promises without the drama. They need one more rug pull on Solana's side before they finish the last ride, like all of us – Bitcoin only.
This drama within Ethereum has been brewing for years, and while it may be late in coming, it is not soon enough for Humanity. The time spent building on what some might argue is a fundamentally flawed system could be better spent advancing technologies that actually hold up the ideals of decentralization and freedom.
As Ethereum continues to navigate its internal conflict, it is a cautionary tale. It emphasizes the importance of a community that values Truth over narrative, freedom over control, and decentralization over centralized decision-making. Bitcoin appears stronger since his civil war it was not just about survival; it was about proving how strong his principles were. Ethereum's continued struggles may be just the catalyst the blockchain community needs to return to those roots, realizing that in the world of digital currencies, only those built on true principles are a product that stands the test of time.
Take a bonus – MAKE this happen Nic: https://x.com/nic__carter/status/1881029931011903772
This article is a Take. The views expressed are entirely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
Articles written by Guillaume may specifically discuss topics or companies that are part of his company's investment portfolio (UTXO instructions). The views are his own and do not represent the views of his employer or associates. He receives no compensation for this. Readers should not consider this content to be financial advice or an endorsement of a particular company or investment. Always do your own research before making any financial decisions.
