There is something to a stereotype of a few of a few of a few of a few of a naive dream and in your laundry, or cold hard treatments and cynics. Stereotypes do not just come in to be unsupported, there is a lawyer of truth for them, on which they would have spread directly as an idea in the first place. But they, in addition to the Burden-examples they also put up obedience to kennel.
Bitcoin is currently stuck in a tug of war game between naive shame and the jaded jadics.
On one hand, the laundry argued so far. Let's not pretend to do anything, Bitcoin has magically succeeded magically. It is already going to take over the world, everyone is going to need it, it is the best source of value ever. That's what it takes to win and succeed. No improvements were needed.
On the other hand, the cynics argue that we are lost, or that you are going. That of change is very much renewed, Bitcoin can not succeed Bitcoin in the world. He will be trapped and useless. “Who knows where to start?” the answer is to ask what improvements are needed.
Both of these will control public communication sweeping away from two important things already with what we have, and how much is possible, and how much is possible with even very small and simple improvements.
As things stand now, bitcoin to any measure that relies on censorship and privacy for a large portion of the world would be up to guardians. The best thing we can do is to do it because many small caumash minutes are small and local, but people have to run ecash nint lightning.
Electronics is complicated, and screwing up and losing the latest channel state will lose all your money. The design allows an accountant to steal all your assets if you try to use a channel state after upgrading. CTV + CSFS would provide ln-symmetry, a type of electronic channel that provides a new way for channels to work. Instead of using an old state allowing the other party to take your money, they cut through “your old state into the first newer chain, ensuring that it would get everyone the right amount of money.
That one would make a small change (and not use all ctv + CSFS all using a landscape that would be able and willing to run a local bint ecash. There would be no risk that money would be losing everyone's money through incompetence.
This one small new function would greatly improve Bitcoin's speeches about living against a private resident and censorship. Is there a self-care scale for the whole world? Does it significantly improve the value of Bitcoin Despite a valuable application source 'There is no need to develop a valuable or possible application? Completely.
Bitcoiners need to stop focusing only on the poles and poles when it comes to potential in this space, there is a wide field largely unexplored in between. If we really want to know our success upur, the limits of what we are of course say and can't do it with bitcoin, we need to study that area.
This article is a Take. Opinions expressed in full by the author and do not necessarily reflect BTC Inction magazine or Bitcoin.
